L'Union Européenne propose une consultation "citoyenne" à propos du traité transatlantique, c'est pipeau mais j'ai répondu

1.  
    
2.  
   

   Oriane Borja a partagé un lien.

   il y a quelques secondes

    

   Public consultation on modalities for investment protection and ISDS in TTIP
   
   
   1. RESPONDENT DETAILS
   
   
   1.1. Type of respondent I am answering this consultation in my own name (as a citizen/individual)
   
   Your details - Individuals
   
   1.1.1. My name may be published alongside my contribution
   
   Yes
   
   1.1.1.1. Contact person
   Oriane Borja 
   
   1.1.1.2. Contact details (address, telephone number, email) - not for publication:
   
   32 rue de Chambord 44 470 Thouaré-sur-Loire 0633691785 [e-mail] 
   
   1.1.2. If you are answering as a citizen/individual, please specify:
   
   Other
   
   1.1.2.1. If you replied "other", please specify:
   French citizen. I don't recognize EU as my country. 
   
   1.2. Your contribution
   I agree for my contribution to be made public on the European Commission's website Yes
   
   1.3. What is your main area/sector of activity/interest?
   Education 
   
   1.4. Registration: Are you registered in the EU's transparency register? No
   
   1.5. Have you already invested in the USA? No
   2. VIEWS ON THE PROPOSED TEXT TO BE USED AS THE BASIS FOR INVESTMENT NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE US
   A. Substantive investment protection provisions
   
   
   Question 1: Scope of the substantive investment protection provisions
   
   
   Question:
   
   Taking into account the above explanation and the text provided in annex as a reference, what is your opinion of the objectives and approach taken in relation to the scope of the substantive investment protection provisions in TTIP?
   
   If you do not want to reply to this question, please type "No comment".
   
   I don't trust the EU to protect us. I only trust in my own state. EU is governed by lobbies, especially by the members of the European Round Table of Industrialists who have not got the same interests as the citizen's ones. 
   
   Question 2: Non-discriminatory treatment for investors
   
   
   Question:
   
   Taking into account the above explanations and the text provided in annex as a reference, what is your opinion of the EU approach to non –discrimination in relation to the TTIP? Please explain.
   
   
   If you do not want to reply to this question, please type "No comment".
   
   I don't care about that. I want discrimination in trade. I want protections. I want my people to have work in his country, with our social laws. I don't want to open many of what you consider as "markets" or sectors. I am afraid that what you include in "exceptions" will be include in your treaty soon or later. We know how you work as IMF OECD World Bank with your techniques of "adaptation". 
   
   Question 3: Fair and equitable treatment
   
   
   Question:
   
   Taking into account the above explanation and the text provided in annex as a reference, what is your opinion of the approach to fair and equitable treatment of investors and their investments in relation to the TTIP?
   
   If you do not want to reply to this question, please type "No comment".
   
   Same answer as above-mentioned 
   
   Question 4: Expropriation
   
   
   Question:
   
   Taking into account the above explanation and the text provided in annex as a reference, what is your opinion of the approach to dealing with expropriation in relation to the TTIP? Please explain.
   
   If you do not want to reply to the question, please type "No comment".
   
   I consider your "Human rights" as vectors and even as catalysts for you business. When I hear these terms, I thought of George Soros and I am afraid. 
   
   Question 5: Ensuring the right to regulate and investment protection
   
   Question:
   
   Taking into account the above explanation and the text provided in annex as a reference, what is your opinion with regard to the way the right to regulate is dealt with in the EU's approach to TTIP?
   
   If you do not want to reply to this question, please type "No comment".
   
   No comment 
   B. Investor-to-State dispute settlement (ISDS)
   
   Question 6: Transparency in ISDS
   
   
   Question:
   
   Taking into account the above explanation and the text provided in annex as a reference, please provide your views on whether this approach contributes to the objective of the EU to increase transparency and openness in the ISDS system for TTIP. Please indicate any additional suggestions you may have. 
   
   If you do not want to reply to this question, please type "No comment".
   
   Most of your acts are secrets so I don't believe any more in your "transparency" policy. In fact when I hear you talk about transparency I think exactly the opposite. 
   
   Question 7: Multiple claims and relationship to domestic courts
   
   
   Question:
   
   Taking into account the above explanation and the text provided in annex as a reference, please provide your views on the effectiveness of this approach for balancing access to ISDS with possible recourse to domestic courts and for avoiding conflicts between domestic remedies and ISDS in relation to the TTIP. Please indicate any further steps that can be taken. Please provide comments on the usefulness of mediation as a means to settle disputes. 
   
   If you do not want to repy to this question, please type "No comment".
   
   No comment 
   
   Question 8: Arbitrator ethics, conduct and qualifications
   
   
   Question:
   
   Taking into account the above explanation and the text provided in annex as a reference, please provide your views on these procedures and in particular on the Code of Conduct and the requirements for the qualifications for arbitrators in relation to the TTIP agreement. Do they improve the existing system and can further improvements be envisaged?
   
   If you do not want to reply to this question, please type "No comment".
   
   EU (ERT) ethic consists in making the children work in the poor countries or in paying people as few as possible. You would rather not talk about ethic. 
   
   Question 9: Reducing the risk of frivolous and unfounded cases
   
   Question:
   
   Taking into account the above explanation and the text provided in annex as a reference, please provide your views on these mechanisms for the avoidance of frivolous or unfounded claims and the removal of incentives in relation to the TTIP agreement. Please also indicate any other means to limit frivolous or unfounded claims. 
   
   If you do not want to reply to this question, please type "No comment".
   
   No comment 
   
   Question 10: Allowing claims to proceed (filter)
   
   
   Question:
   
   Some investment agreements include filter mechanisms whereby the Parties to the agreement (here the EU and the US) may intervene in ISDS cases where an investor seeks to challenge measures adopted pursuant to prudential rules for financial stability. In such cases the Parties may decide jointly that a claim should not proceed any further. Taking into account the above explanation and the text provided in annex as a reference, what are your views on the use and scope of such filter mechanisms in the TTIP agreement?
   
   If you do not want to reply to this question, please type "No comment".
   
   More Europe we have, more financial instability you have. I think we will recover our harmony when we will break with the principles of the European Union, specially with the free trade. 
   
   Question 11: Guidance by the Parties (the EU and the US) on the interpretation of the agreement 
   
   
   Question:
   
   Taking into account the above explanation and the text provided in annex as a reference, please provide your views on this approach to ensure uniformity and predictability in the interpretation of the agreement to correct the balance? Are these elements desirable, and if so, do you consider them to be sufficient?
   
   If you do not want to reply to this question, please type "No comment".
   
   I do not want to have other justice than the old and wise justice of my country. 
   
   Question 12: Appellate Mechanism and consistency of rulings
   
   Question:
   
   Taking into account the above explanation and the text provided in annex as a reference, please provide your views on the creation of an appellate mechanism in TTIP as a means to ensure uniformity and predictability in the interpretation of the agreement.
   
   If you do not want to reply to this question, please type "No comment".
   
   I want my country sovereign in all its attributes and not only according to the good will of the other countries. 
   C. General assessment
   
   
   What is your overall assessment of the proposed approach on substantive standards of protection and ISDS as a basis for investment negotiations between the EU and US?
   
   
   
   Do you see other ways for the EU to improve the investment system? 
   
   
   
   Are there any other issues related to the topics covered by the questionnaire that you would like to address?
   
   
   If you do not want to reply to these questions, please type "No comment". 
   
   My overall assessement is that I have a very bad presentiment, I don't want any kind of system over my country. I think it is inhumain and dangerous for our liberty and our happiness. 
   Meta Informations
   
   Creation date
   28-04-2014 
   
   Last update date
   
   
   User name
   
   
   Case Number
   321540353101811814 
   
   Invitation Ref.
   
   
   Status
   N 
   
   Language
   en